<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HijackThis, popular anti-malware tool SOLD!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/</link>
	<description>formerly TomCoyote</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: User</title>
		<link>http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomcoyote.org/security/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/123/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>You could always use the older version. But that wont be updated. As merijn said. Hes too busy. Or you could get the updated version, that will have a lot of new features. Besides, it will always stay free. So whats wrong with that? CWShredder remained free.. and so will HJT. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always use the older version. But that wont be updated. As merijn said. Hes too busy. Or you could get the updated version, that will have a lot of new features. Besides, it will always stay free. So whats wrong with that? CWShredder remained free.. and so will HJT. <img src='http://www.whatthetech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coachwife6</title>
		<link>http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>coachwife6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomcoyote.org/security/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/123/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Wow. I don't even know what to think.  I will be interested in what others have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I don't even know what to think.  I will be interested in what others have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FastFred</title>
		<link>http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>FastFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomcoyote.org/security/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/123/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>They added support for IE7 and Vista.  That's a definite plus that the old version didn't have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They added support for IE7 and Vista.  That's a definite plus that the old version didn't have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nosh</title>
		<link>http://www.whatthetech.com/2007/03/11/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Nosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomcoyote.org/security/hijackthis-popular-anti-malware-tool-sold/123/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm a big HJT fan and assumed it was an open source thingie that Trend Micro had modded. I hate it when people eff around with tried and tested s/w. And Google has never failed me whenever I'm curious about exactly what a file does. Wish these commercial types would stop piggy-backing on the hard work of others. I'm sticking with 1.99</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I'm a big HJT fan and assumed it was an open source thingie that Trend Micro had modded. I hate it when people eff around with tried and tested s/w. And Google has never failed me whenever I'm curious about exactly what a file does. Wish these commercial types would stop piggy-backing on the hard work of others. I'm sticking with 1.99</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
